Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Expand Access To Nature - Urge Your Legislator To Cosponsor The Transit To Trails Act!

 If you want to take action to increase equitable access to public lands and parks, please, support the Transit to Trails Act you can do so here: https://sc.org/3jrr37G

Below is the wording in the Sierra Club petition. It is always a good idea to add a personal comment. 

Please Become a Cosponsor of the Transit to Trails Act (H.R. 2924 and S. 1461)

I urge you to cosponsor the Transit to Trails Act, a bill that seeks to reduce barriers between people and nature by providing new grant funding from the Department of Transportation for transportation systems to and from underserved communities and public lands.

Everyone, regardless of their zip code, should have the opportunity to enjoy our nation's vast network of national parks and publicly protected lands. Outdoor recreation contributes more than $750 billion to our economy, yet access to our nation's public lands is limited to people who own a car.

The positive effects of nature have been proven, and everyone should be able to enjoy our public lands. Accessible transportation options help achieve this.

Please join your colleagues in Congress to advance outdoor opportunities for all communities by co-sponsoring and supporting the Transit to Trails Act.

More information:

Closing the Nature Equity Gap with Public Transit

Thursday, June 24, 2021

COMMENTS NEEDED TODAY to protect the San Pedro River!

photo by G. Anderson, WWP 


Comments Needed 

The San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area was set aside by Presidential Proclamation in 1988 to conserve, protect, and enhance the unique and fragile San Pedro River and the public lands along its banks. This was the first Riparian National Conservation Area ever designated, and it is truly a special and ecologically important place. Because of this designation, the Bureau of Land Management has a heightened duty to “protect the riparian areas and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the public lands surrounding the San Pedro River in Cochise County.”

Unfortunately, the Bureau has failed to meet their burden in protecting this riparian desert treasure, and for decades has allowed livestock grazing to continue to damage wildlife habitats, the uplands, the riparian areas, and the river itself. Right now, the Bureau is proposing to issue 10-year grazing leases to a small group of ranchers who will be able to graze their cows at rock bottom prices (just $1.35 per cow-calf pair per month), while at the same time turning their backs on mountains of evidence clearly indicating that livestock do not belong on these conservation lands.

We need your help, to let the Bureau know that we expect them to faithfully do their job.

Urge the BLM to conserve, protect, and enhance the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area by eliminating livestock grazing from the entirety of the area.

You can send your comments to the BLM via email: blm_az_tfo_sprnca_rmp@blm.gov.

We’ve read through nearly 400 pages of documents and developed these talking points to get you started on your own letter to the agency:

  • The BLM must recognize that a proposal to authorize four 10-year leases in a Riparian National Conservation Area requires the full review and analysis of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), rather than the abbreviated analysis and timeframe for public comment allowed in an Environmental Analysis (EA).

  • The agency must analyze at least one alternative that eliminates livestock grazing from all portions of all allotments that fall within the boundaries of the San Pedro RNCA.

  • The public deserves to know how much the fencing, stock tanks, troughs, and other livestock infrastructure will cost, and how much money the ranchers will be required to pay for the privilege of grazing these publicly owned lands.

  • The agency must analyze the impacts on recreational users of their plan to put cows, fences, gates, and huge gap fences across the Babocomari River, as well impacts of livestock on educational and cultural resources.

  • The agency must develop a plan to address the ongoing and longstanding problem of cows trespassing into the San Pedro RNCA and must disclose how these new 10-year leases will exacerbate that problem.

  • Ask the agency to protect the Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Babocomari and San Pedro Rivers and not to compromise the ability of these rivers to be designated as Wild and Scenic Rivers.

  • The agency must be held accountable for failing to protect public health by allowing livestock to contaminate the San Pedro and Babocomari Rivers with E. coli, violating Arizona’s clean water standards.

  • Finally, the agency needs to explain how allowing livestock in a national riparian conservation area during a period of extraordinary drought, and in light of climate change impacts to rivers and wildlife, meets the agency’s duty to conserve, protect, and enhance these lands.

The BLM will release an environmental analysis (EA) document for the next step in this process. Given that the Land Health Evaluations and scoping packet were almost 400 pages, we expect the EA will be huge, but no matter how much paperwork the BLM does, it is likely to again miss the mark on actually ensuring grazing conserves, protects, and enhances the special resources of the San Pedro Riparian NCA

If you have visited the San Pedro RNCA, you can send photos, stories, drawings, songs or poems about your visit in your comments and let BLM know how important these public lands are to you.

Thank you for taking the time to speak out for this precious place! For more information, contact Cyndi Tuell, cyndi@westernwatersheds.org


- WWP


More information: 

BLM considers renewing cattle grazing along San Pedro River with new conditions

https://tucson.com/news/local/blm-considers-renewing-cattle-grazing-along-san-pedro-river-with-new-conditions/article_c9252d72-d37e-11eb-9edb-f765d9cc65cd.html?fbclid=IwAR3-GqiS89LyFX2YtXiIoAWl16XQ26DNYqzxYblOqLjbJ-7b_kKRH0UwA8M

Thursday, June 3, 2021

TELL PAG & RTA: ENACT AN INCLUSIVE & GREEN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Please, call on the Pima Association of Governments (PAG)'s Regional Council & The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)'s Board of Directors to have an inclusive, green, and just mobility agenda. The people who live and pay taxes in the City of Tucson deserve fair funding & representation, and a regional mobility plan that is reflective of our needs as residents of Tucson. We know that investments that make sense for Tucson and our region include a mobility system that is safe and accessible for people walking and biking; a transit system that includes an electrified fleet and rapid transit; and maintenance of our aging road infrastructure.

Tucson is the third most quickly heating city in the United States. Transportation emissions created are the largest contributor to greenhouse gases. Any regional transportation plan must address issues of climate change, adaptation and resilience. This means we need a focus on alternate modes of transportation as a priority with the following conditions addressed:

• A re-imagined and updated Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) that is reflective of our community and includes members from a wide variety of demographics and perspectives. The current CAC sunset was at the end of May 2021.

• A clear commitment to green transit

• Equitable distributions of funds and projects to Tucson, in particular, the South side of Tucson.

• The voices of the Tohono O'odham Nation and the Pascua Yaqui be represented at every table and decision-making opportunity

• Transparency and decision-making open to the public in tangible, meaningful ways

• Increased transportation choices, improved safety, and investments in maintaining existing infrastructure

• Opportunities for the participation, input and collaboration of Tucson residents beyond the CAC

• Sharing of all public comments and input in their entirety available to all levels of PAG/RTA, administration and the public

• Flexibility and responsiveness to changing traffic patterns, land uses, and emerging technologies that will occur over the life of the plan

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Transportation, Transit and Mobility are among the most critical issues we face today. We have made and continue to make our voices heard by participating in MOVE TUCSON planning. We want a mobility plan for Tucson's future and not a distant past. We need a regional transportation plan, like the RTA Next, that is innovative and inclusive.

Please, sign this petition and share this with your friends. 

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Ask Rep. Kirkpatrick to support the "We the People Amendment."

H.J.Res 48, the "We the People Amendment," is finally listed on Congress.gov. After only a week we have 57 cosponsors, but Congresswoman Kirkpatrick is not yet one of them.

Representative Kirkpatrick took a pledge in 2018 to support the We the People Amendment but she has not yet come through on her promise. She needs to hear from more constituents.

Insistence and persistence are two key principles for being heard by our elected representatives.

Those are the goals of #WethePeopleWednesdays!

One short call. Every. Single. Wednesday.

The message: "I'm calling to ask Rep. Kirkpatrick to come through on her pledge and co-sponsor HJR 48, the We the People Amendment---the only solution that comprehensively addresses the undemocratic constitutional doctrines that political money in elections is free speech and corporations are persons with constitutional rights.”

The numbers:

DC - (202) 225-2542

Sierra Vista - (520) 459-3115

Tucson - (520) 881-3588

Monday, May 10, 2021

Stop Arizona bill that will roll back tobacco prevention laws. Contact your Arizona reps now.


The Arizona House of Representatives is about to vote on a very bad bill. Backed by the tobacco industry, HB-2682 would roll back local tobacco prevention laws across the state and ban Arizona communities from passing new ones!

We have to stop it from passing. Please contact your state representative ASAP:

In communities across Arizona, parents, teachers, doctors, and local elected officials have come together to decide what's best for their kids, passing laws that protect them from tobacco products and tobacco industry targeting. HB-2682 would undo this work, decimate local tobacco control efforts, and give the tobacco industry free reign in our state. It's truly a gift to Big Tobacco.

And it's especially egregious as Arizona faces a new youth nicotine addiction crisis, with 1 in 5 high school students now using e-cigarettes.

This bad bill just passed the state Senate! The House is now expected to vote on final passage as early as TODAY, March 10th.

This is our last chance to stop it before it goes to Governor Ducey's desk.

Send a message to your state representative ASAP today telling them to reject HB-2682 >>

Monday, May 3, 2021

How to literally bridge park zoo

 

The following column is the opinion and analysis of the writer:

BOB VINT

Special to the Arizona Daily Star

Our community has been roiled in recent months by a controversy over the proposed expansion of Tucson's Reid Park Zoo into sensitive areas of Reid Park.

We can't agree on whether Barnum Hill is a just a pile of dirt standing in the way of progress, or a special place full of memories for thousands of Tucsonans. City officials are cognizant of their responsibility to spend tax dollars wisely, while activists advocate for preserving the majestic old trees, aquatic wildlife and public green space to counteract the heat island effect raising temperatures in our fair city.

Leaving disagreements aside, a group of Tucsonans has developed an alternative concept that addresses the legitimate concerns of all parties: a way to expand the zoo within a reasonable budget, while saving Barnum Hill and its mature tree canopy, the south pond, as well as all existing public green space.

We're calling this alternative 'G-Minor' because it's a variation of the community-preferred concept 'G' (expanding north into an underutilized service area) from among the many choices offered in the city's recently conducted survey.

We propose to extend the zoo north into a paved area now containing prefab metal storage structures that can be readily relocated off-site. Our approach is to reduce costs by minimizing disturbance of existing site features. Here's a written outline of our concept: A. Existing zoo entrance plaza to remain as-is (zero cost).

B. Existing zoo parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

C. Existing solar panel structures to remain as-is (zero cost).

D. Existing therapeutic center to remain as-is (zero cost).

E. Existing communications towers to remain as-is (zero cost).

F. Existing therapeutic pool and associated parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

G. Expand the zoo north into area of underutilized storage buildings (this would be approximately the same cost as Tucson city manager's favored Concept D.

* Additional cost: Replacement of metal storage buildings, which would be approximately $1.5 million.

H. A New over/under concrete arch bridge to connect the zoo expansion and permit pedestrian and service access to pool, ponds and Barnum Hill (cost: two spans at $250,000 each total out to $500,000.

The key to making this work is a pedestrian bridge extending north from the present zoo to the expansion area, while allowing east-west pedestrian traffic beneath it, along with access for required service vehicles.

We have explored the concept and received a cost estimate from an innovative engineer who designs and builds cost-effective thin-shell concrete arched bridges.

Such a bridge, which can be gently sloped for accessibility, would add an exciting element to the zoo experience, and permit the expansion without cutting the park in half. As a bonus this concept preserves the existing 4.3 acres of green space that would be lost under Concept D.

The cost of the bridge is offset by the savings of not having to re-create lost parkland elsewhere. And a bridge is a nice thing! (think of the bridges in NYC's Central Park — and Reid Park is Tucson's Central Park). Pedestrians crossing over would have views of the wider park and pond, plus distant views. Passers-by in the park would see zoo-goers crossing. A bridge becomes a signature element, an amenity for all.

My experience as an architect working with the Arizona/ Sonora Desert Museum tells me that the extra walking distance necessary to cross the bridge is actually an advantage.

One reason the Desert Museum expanded into the Arizona Uplands area was to increase their footprint, to be able to spread visitors out to avoid crowding. Plus, walking is good for us!

And the bridge might include zoo displays, demonstrations and exhibits along its path. In this light the extra distance is an opportunity, which can be accomplished without excessive cost.

In the end, the true value of preserving the heart of Reid Park isn't measured in dollars and cents. It's the environmental benefit of saving the great trees and the open space to be enjoyed by the community, for the common good, while accommodating the needs of the Reid Park Zoo.

Bob Vint is an architect and Tucson native. He's teaches arid region urban design at the University of Arizona School of Architecture.


https://savetheheartofreidpark.org/option-gminor?fbclid=IwAR1icOEf3LTHcSs1GrAtHVQTHU7GR9Oy-4esQdApQqH6DhBS7-iHyecpHSc


Contact information for your City Council Members: 

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/city-government


Tucson City Council votes to expand Reid Park Zoo to the northwest, Tucson.com, May 5, 2021  



Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Share your Priorities at the Mayor's Climate Action and Adaptation Budget Town Hall and Survey

This Saturday, March 20th at 10:30am is the Mayor's Climate Action and Adaptation Budget Town Hall.

Join us and share your priorities for climate action and adaptation.

Link to register:  http://bit.ly/3bHDZCk   

Another way to share your priorities...

The City of Tucson is seeking input on priorities for both city government and community-wide climate and environmental sustainability actions. Please, fill out the following survey. 


City of Tucson's Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Community Survey