Monday, October 11, 2021

WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH 2 "BUILD BACK BETTER BILLS?"


If you've had trouble following the latest developments in Congress, you're not alone. Here's an update on President Biden's transformative Build Back Better plan.

The Build Back Better plan is moving forward in two separate bills. The first bill, focused on infrastructure, includes a mix of good things and not-so-good things and passed the Senate in September with the support of Mitch McConnell and 19 other Republicans.

The second bill (The Reconciliation bill) includes a sweeping set of reforms that help everyday Americans and that corporate-backed Republicans hate, including lower drug prices, expanded pre-K, free community college, paid family leave, and raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy.

Last week, there was a big push to pass only the Republican-backed infrastructure bill in the House while leaving the crucial second bill by the wayside. But House progressives refused to go along, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not allow a vote on the bill, a key step toward victory.

Now, we're facing a new threat. Joe Manchin is demanding that the bill be cut by more than half, which would almost surely gut some of the most critical parts of the bill.

To succeed in this new phase of the campaign, we must accomplish one key strategic objective: educate voters on what's actually in the bill.

Now, that should be the job of the mainstream media, but instead they've been focused on building false, shock-value narratives about the cost of the bill—$3.5 trillion—without providing any context, making it easy for Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema, and the Republicans to attack it. But failing to invest in education, clean energy, and health care ... in order to preserve tax breaks for Jeff Bezos? That's wildly unpopular—and to win, we need to make sure everyone knows that's really what's at stake.

This plan will be a game changer for Arizona.  

The Please, SHARE THIS INFORMATION and contact Sen. Kyrsten Sinema  and urge her to support the Reconciliation Bill.

Tucson Office Phone: 520-639-7080

Phoenix Phone: 602-598-7327

Washington D.C. Phone: 202-224-4521

Thursday, August 5, 2021

Help Water Protectors Being Attacked for protesting Line 3

Police officers detain a demonstrator as people protest the Line 3 pipeline by occupying an Enbridge pump station construction site in Hubbard County, June 7, 2021.  REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi

Over the weekend, 20 water protectors were brutally arrested in Northern Minnesota for peacefully resisting the Line 3 tar sands pipeline.

Here’s a glimpse of the scene from Tara Houska, water protector and founder of the Giniw Collective:

“The level of brutality that was unleashed on us was very extreme. People were shot in their faces, in their bodies, in their upper torsos. It was a really, really brutal scene.

We were outnumbered by police at least two to one. We were under smoky skies and a red sun due to the wildfires that are raging in Ontario, just north of us and west of us, and next to a drought-stricken river.”

We must stand in solidarity with those on the frontlines and continue to put pressure on President Biden to stop this pipeline. Will you help?

Here are three actions you can take right now to call on President Biden to #StopLine3:

1. Contact the White House: Fill in your contact information and write a message in your own words here about why you want Biden to stop Line 3.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Sample: "Please stop the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Like Keystone XL, the Line 3 tar sands pipeline is a threat to our climate and water and violates Native American treaty rights. Please take action to stop the construction and invest in clean energy instead."

2. Share on Social Media: We need to spread the word and show President Biden that Americans across the country are watching. Send a message to Biden on Twitter here, or share this post on Facebook here.

3. Join one of the resistance camps: We know it’s a big ask, but it is a huge privilege for Indigenous leaders to extend this invitation and offer an opportunity for supporters like you to learn directly from frontline leaders. All participants must adhere to the camp’s safety protocols, including COVID-19 guidelines. Learn more and sign up here.


Just last week, a spill was reported on the Mississippi River. Meanwhile, more than 75% of Minnesota is in severe or extreme drought and wildfires are causing the worst air quality in Minnesota history.

The climate crisis is here – in Minnesota and across the country – and we have a moral obligation to stop all fossil fuels now. 

President Biden declared climate change the “number one issue facing humanity” and vowed a national transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. And yet he has allowed Line 3 to continue even though he has the authority to pull the federal permits now.

Please, take one of the actions above and together we can put as much pressure on Biden as possible.

More Information:

Water Protectors Shot with “Less Lethal” Police Munitions at Line 3 Pipeline Protests - Aug. 3, 2021

We must stop HR 1374, a newly proposed federal law which could crush First Amendment rights nationwide.

Law Enforcement Can Now Kill Water Protectors. Date: 07/28/2021

Monday, August 2, 2021

Needed: Public Comments on I -11 Final Environmental Impact Statement

Photo by Frank Staub

Public Comment on the I-11 Final EIS

On Friday, July 16, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and the Federal Highways Administration (FHA) released the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the proposed Interstate 11 freeway. The FEIS identifies two possible Preferred Alternatives, a West Option that would cut through Avra Valley and an East Option that would co-locate I-11 with I-19 and I-10 through the Tucson region. The proposed highway would run from the border with Mexico up to Wickenberg and is intended primarily for transit of commercial goods.
 
The West Option for Interstate 11 would build a new freeway through Tohono O’odham lands and would run right next to Saguaro National Park West/Tucson Mountain Park, the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, and -- cut off on the other side of the highway -- Ironwood Forest National Monument. The East Option would run through Tucson.
 
Both of these routes would have serious environmental impacts, with the West Option notable for the destruction of Sonoran Desert lands and disruption of wildlife habitat that it would cause.
 
ADOT and the FHA have set a deadline of August 16, 2021 for public comment on the FEIS. This 30-day comment period does not offer enough time to review the FEIS, which is 5,000 pages long, and to understand fully the impacts these two routes will have on our region.
 
We are joining colleagues at the Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, Sky Island Alliance, Living Streets Alliance, and others in encouraging everyone to request that ADOT and the FHA extend the comment period from 30 days to 120 days.
 
The Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection has a useful resource page with information about I-11 and the proposed routes, talking points, a link to the FEIS, and details on the various ways you can submit comments:  https://www.sonorandesert.org/learning-more/interstate-11/
 
Please take action and request this extension as soon as possible.

More Information: 

If you want to see If you want to see the just-released Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Interstate 11 go to: http://i11study.com/Arizona/Documents.asp

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

Urge your Members of Congress to support the Break Free from Plastic Prevention Act

Please, reach out to your Members of Congress to support the Break Free from Plastic Prevention Act of 2021 (H.R. 2238, S.984) and to thank Rep. Grijalva for co-sponsoring the Act.

Below is the letter drafted by the head of  Sustainable Tucson's Zero Plastic Waste Team, Kevin Green. You can cut and paste your message on their website (addresses below.)

Rep. Kirkpatrick
https://kirkpatrick.house.gov/contact/email-me/
Phone: 520-881-3588

Rep. O'halleran
https://ohalleran.house.gov/zip-code-lookup?form=/contact/email
520-316-0839

Sen. Sinema
https://www.sinema.senate.gov/contact-kyrsten
(520) 639-7080

Sen. Kelly
https://www.kelly.senate.gov/
520-475-5177

To thank Rep. Grijalva for being a co-sponsor of the act:

Rep. Grijalva
https://grijalva.house.gov/contact-raul/
(520) 622-6788

Sample letter:

I am reaching out to urge you to support the Break Free from Plastic Prevention Act of 2021 (H.R. 2238, S.984). Introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (OR) and Rep. Alan Lowenthal (CA), this bill represents the most comprehensive set of policy solutions to the plastic pollution crisis ever introduced in the U.S. Congress.

Introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (OR) and Rep. Alan Lowenthal (CA), this bill represents the most comprehensive set of policy solutions to the plastic pollution crisis ever introduced in the U.S. Congress.

The United States generates more plastic waste than any country in the world. Plastic is made from fossil fuels by processes that cause air pollution and contribute to climate change. Up to 50% of plastics manufactured are for single-use purposes — used for just a few moments and then discarded. Most plastic is never recycled — over 90% of it ends up in landfills or our oceans.

Plastic pollution is inundating our communities, our waterways, and even our bodies. It is making its way into our food, drinking water, and even the air in the form of microplastics — plastic debris that breaks up into smaller and smaller particles.

Plastic contributes to climate change at every step of its life cycle, from extraction to refinement, manufacture, transportation, disposal, and waste.

The BFFPPA will tackle the exploding crisis of plastic pollution and transform waste and recycling management in the U.S. Key provisions of the bill include:
  • Phasing out unnecessary single-use plastics,
  • Establishing national recycling targets,
  • Shifting responsibility for waste management and recycling to the manufacturers and producers,
  • Establishing minimum recycled content standards,
  • Encouraging a shift to refillable and reusable alternatives,
  • Creating a moratorium on new plastic production facilities
These changes are all important to help ensure a healthy and climate resilient future.

We cannot simply recycle our way out of a crisis this massive. Corporations and plastic producers must take responsibility for the waste created by their products. We must address the problem at the source by reducing the amount of single-use plastic we use and encouraging a shift toward better and reusable materials.

Please support this national legislation that is crucial to meaningfully addressing the plastic waste problem.

Tuesday, July 20, 2021

TAKE ACTION: Next steps on Move Tucson transportation plan


Move Tucson is the city-wide mobility plan being developed as a way to implement Tucson's Complete Streets policy. For the past several months Department of Transportation and Mobility has been working to analyze existing conditions of our transportation network, and gain an understanding of community priorities. TDTM has identified 234 projects totaling approximately $5.7 billion dollars that will make Tucson's transportation system more complete.

Tucson's Department of Transportation and Mobility (TDTM) has compiled its Move Tucson projects list based on survey feedback, and the next steps include:
(1) Asking Tucsonans to further prioritize what work should be done when. 
(2) TDTM will host a virtual town hall on Fri 23-JUL-2021 at 12:00N to gather your comments. More info at -- https://movetucson.org

Join by computer at -- https://bit.ly/MoveTucsonTownHall2

From March until August 2020, Tucsonans shared their vision for the city’s mobility future. Over 4,500 people participated in the online survey from all areas of the city.

These responses confirmed that Tucsonans want:
Roads, streets, and paths that provide safe and connected access for all modes.
Better ways to travel across town
Safety improvements for all modes, particularly for those walking and biking
Improve connectivity by closing network gaps, providing safe crossings at major roadways for all users, and supporting cross-town mobility options
Prioritize maintenance, including repaving roadways and bikeways, removing debris, repairing sidewalks, and addressing potholes across the network
Increased options for how to get around
Transportation options that support a sustainable city
Increase shade and vegetation to improve comfort of travel along roadways and paths
Improve access for persons with disabilities, particularly for trails and bridges
Slow vehicle speeds to improve safety and comfort of travel along city roadways

Catalyst Corridor projects (see pic above) are large-scale Complete Streets projects that create space for multiple modes along an entire corridor, creating significant change to the look, feel, and operations on the street. These projects improve safety and access for most modes of travel and will involve: reconstructing pavement, adding continuous sidewalks and enhanced bike lanes, and upgrading traffic signals, among others. 
$1,828,792,775 COMBINED COST
SEE PROJECT LIST (PDF)122

Move Tucson is asking Tucsonans to look over the proposed projects and indicate their priorities on a new interactive map and to share where they would like the money budgeted to go. 


Check out their online map + share your thoughts:

(1) Project map 

https://movetucsonrecommendations.altaplanning.cloud/storage/app/media/project_lists/Move%20Tucson_%20MAP_Draft%20Prioritization%20Results_20210615.pdf

(2) Project list 
https://movetucsonrecommendations.altaplanning.cloud/storage/app/media/project_lists/MoveTucson_CombinedProjectList.pdf

(3) Step through the different categories and detailed explanations of each (requires javascript) -- https://movetucsonrecommendations.altaplanning.cloud/en#/catalyst-corridor-projects

(4) Survey form (requires javascript that is already set up in most computers) -- https://movetucsonrecommendations.altaplanning.cloud/en#/overview

More Information:

Diana Alarcon shared a presentation on proposed projects and how to navigate the Move Tucson app. 

https://youtu.be/CO4cybvj1lE?t=1185

This is a key moment to help them further prioritize which of the projects is implemented first. Make sure to take the survey and share your thoughts and priorities! Your input helps shape this very important transportation initiative that will guide Tucson's growth for generations to come.


Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Expand Access To Nature - Urge Your Legislator To Cosponsor The Transit To Trails Act!

 If you want to take action to increase equitable access to public lands and parks, please, support the Transit to Trails Act you can do so here: https://sc.org/3jrr37G

Below is the wording in the Sierra Club petition. It is always a good idea to add a personal comment. 

Please Become a Cosponsor of the Transit to Trails Act (H.R. 2924 and S. 1461)

I urge you to cosponsor the Transit to Trails Act, a bill that seeks to reduce barriers between people and nature by providing new grant funding from the Department of Transportation for transportation systems to and from underserved communities and public lands.

Everyone, regardless of their zip code, should have the opportunity to enjoy our nation's vast network of national parks and publicly protected lands. Outdoor recreation contributes more than $750 billion to our economy, yet access to our nation's public lands is limited to people who own a car.

The positive effects of nature have been proven, and everyone should be able to enjoy our public lands. Accessible transportation options help achieve this.

Please join your colleagues in Congress to advance outdoor opportunities for all communities by co-sponsoring and supporting the Transit to Trails Act.

More information:

Closing the Nature Equity Gap with Public Transit


Thursday, June 24, 2021

COMMENTS NEEDED TODAY to protect the San Pedro River!

photo by G. Anderson, WWP 


Comments Needed 

The San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area was set aside by Presidential Proclamation in 1988 to conserve, protect, and enhance the unique and fragile San Pedro River and the public lands along its banks. This was the first Riparian National Conservation Area ever designated, and it is truly a special and ecologically important place. Because of this designation, the Bureau of Land Management has a heightened duty to “protect the riparian areas and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the public lands surrounding the San Pedro River in Cochise County.”

Unfortunately, the Bureau has failed to meet their burden in protecting this riparian desert treasure, and for decades has allowed livestock grazing to continue to damage wildlife habitats, the uplands, the riparian areas, and the river itself. Right now, the Bureau is proposing to issue 10-year grazing leases to a small group of ranchers who will be able to graze their cows at rock bottom prices (just $1.35 per cow-calf pair per month), while at the same time turning their backs on mountains of evidence clearly indicating that livestock do not belong on these conservation lands.

We need your help, to let the Bureau know that we expect them to faithfully do their job.

Urge the BLM to conserve, protect, and enhance the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area by eliminating livestock grazing from the entirety of the area.

You can send your comments to the BLM via email: blm_az_tfo_sprnca_rmp@blm.gov.

We’ve read through nearly 400 pages of documents and developed these talking points to get you started on your own letter to the agency:

  • The BLM must recognize that a proposal to authorize four 10-year leases in a Riparian National Conservation Area requires the full review and analysis of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), rather than the abbreviated analysis and timeframe for public comment allowed in an Environmental Analysis (EA).

  • The agency must analyze at least one alternative that eliminates livestock grazing from all portions of all allotments that fall within the boundaries of the San Pedro RNCA.

  • The public deserves to know how much the fencing, stock tanks, troughs, and other livestock infrastructure will cost, and how much money the ranchers will be required to pay for the privilege of grazing these publicly owned lands.

  • The agency must analyze the impacts on recreational users of their plan to put cows, fences, gates, and huge gap fences across the Babocomari River, as well impacts of livestock on educational and cultural resources.

  • The agency must develop a plan to address the ongoing and longstanding problem of cows trespassing into the San Pedro RNCA and must disclose how these new 10-year leases will exacerbate that problem.

  • Ask the agency to protect the Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Babocomari and San Pedro Rivers and not to compromise the ability of these rivers to be designated as Wild and Scenic Rivers.

  • The agency must be held accountable for failing to protect public health by allowing livestock to contaminate the San Pedro and Babocomari Rivers with E. coli, violating Arizona’s clean water standards.

  • Finally, the agency needs to explain how allowing livestock in a national riparian conservation area during a period of extraordinary drought, and in light of climate change impacts to rivers and wildlife, meets the agency’s duty to conserve, protect, and enhance these lands.

The BLM will release an environmental analysis (EA) document for the next step in this process. Given that the Land Health Evaluations and scoping packet were almost 400 pages, we expect the EA will be huge, but no matter how much paperwork the BLM does, it is likely to again miss the mark on actually ensuring grazing conserves, protects, and enhances the special resources of the San Pedro Riparian NCA

If you have visited the San Pedro RNCA, you can send photos, stories, drawings, songs or poems about your visit in your comments and let BLM know how important these public lands are to you.

Thank you for taking the time to speak out for this precious place! For more information, contact Cyndi Tuell, cyndi@westernwatersheds.org


- WWP


More information: 

BLM considers renewing cattle grazing along San Pedro River with new conditions

https://tucson.com/news/local/blm-considers-renewing-cattle-grazing-along-san-pedro-river-with-new-conditions/article_c9252d72-d37e-11eb-9edb-f765d9cc65cd.html?fbclid=IwAR3-GqiS89LyFX2YtXiIoAWl16XQ26DNYqzxYblOqLjbJ-7b_kKRH0UwA8M

Thursday, June 3, 2021

TELL PAG & RTA: ENACT AN INCLUSIVE & GREEN TRANSPORTATION PLAN


Please, call on the Pima Association of Governments (PAG)'s Regional Council & The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)'s Board of Directors to have an inclusive, green, and just mobility agenda. The people who live and pay taxes in the City of Tucson deserve fair funding & representation, and a regional mobility plan that is reflective of our needs as residents of Tucson. We know that investments that make sense for Tucson and our region include a mobility system that is safe and accessible for people walking and biking; a transit system that includes an electrified fleet and rapid transit; and maintenance of our aging road infrastructure.

Tucson is the third most quickly heating city in the United States. Transportation emissions created are the largest contributor to greenhouse gases. Any regional transportation plan must address issues of climate change, adaptation and resilience. This means we need a focus on alternate modes of transportation as a priority with the following conditions addressed:

• A re-imagined and updated Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) that is reflective of our community and includes members from a wide variety of demographics and perspectives. The current CAC sunset was at the end of May 2021.

• A clear commitment to green transit

• Equitable distributions of funds and projects to Tucson, in particular, the South side of Tucson.

• The voices of the Tohono O'odham Nation and the Pascua Yaqui be represented at every table and decision-making opportunity

• Transparency and decision-making open to the public in tangible, meaningful ways

• Increased transportation choices, improved safety, and investments in maintaining existing infrastructure

• Opportunities for the participation, input and collaboration of Tucson residents beyond the CAC

• Sharing of all public comments and input in their entirety available to all levels of PAG/RTA, administration and the public

• Flexibility and responsiveness to changing traffic patterns, land uses, and emerging technologies that will occur over the life of the plan

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Transportation, Transit and Mobility are among the most critical issues we face today. We have made and continue to make our voices heard by participating in MOVE TUCSON planning. We want a mobility plan for Tucson's future and not a distant past. We need a regional transportation plan, like the RTA Next, that is innovative and inclusive.

Please, sign this petition and share this with your friends. 

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Ask Rep. Kirkpatrick to support the "We the People Amendment."

H.J.Res 48, the "We the People Amendment," is finally listed on Congress.gov. After only a week we have 57 cosponsors, but Congresswoman Kirkpatrick is not yet one of them.

Representative Kirkpatrick took a pledge in 2018 to support the We the People Amendment but she has not yet come through on her promise. She needs to hear from more constituents.

Insistence and persistence are two key principles for being heard by our elected representatives.

Those are the goals of #WethePeopleWednesdays!

One short call. Every. Single. Wednesday.

The message: "I'm calling to ask Rep. Kirkpatrick to come through on her pledge and co-sponsor HJR 48, the We the People Amendment---the only solution that comprehensively addresses the undemocratic constitutional doctrines that political money in elections is free speech and corporations are persons with constitutional rights.”

The numbers:

DC - (202) 225-2542

Sierra Vista - (520) 459-3115

Tucson - (520) 881-3588


Monday, May 10, 2021

Stop Arizona bill that will roll back tobacco prevention laws. Contact your Arizona reps now.


The Arizona House of Representatives is about to vote on a very bad bill. Backed by the tobacco industry, HB-2682 would roll back local tobacco prevention laws across the state and ban Arizona communities from passing new ones!

We have to stop it from passing. Please contact your state representative ASAP:

In communities across Arizona, parents, teachers, doctors, and local elected officials have come together to decide what's best for their kids, passing laws that protect them from tobacco products and tobacco industry targeting. HB-2682 would undo this work, decimate local tobacco control efforts, and give the tobacco industry free reign in our state. It's truly a gift to Big Tobacco.

And it's especially egregious as Arizona faces a new youth nicotine addiction crisis, with 1 in 5 high school students now using e-cigarettes.

This bad bill just passed the state Senate! The House is now expected to vote on final passage as early as TODAY, March 10th.

This is our last chance to stop it before it goes to Governor Ducey's desk.

Send a message to your state representative ASAP today telling them to reject HB-2682 >>

Monday, May 3, 2021

How to literally bridge park zoo

 

The following column is the opinion and analysis of the writer:

BOB VINT

Special to the Arizona Daily Star

Our community has been roiled in recent months by a controversy over the proposed expansion of Tucson's Reid Park Zoo into sensitive areas of Reid Park.

We can't agree on whether Barnum Hill is a just a pile of dirt standing in the way of progress, or a special place full of memories for thousands of Tucsonans. City officials are cognizant of their responsibility to spend tax dollars wisely, while activists advocate for preserving the majestic old trees, aquatic wildlife and public green space to counteract the heat island effect raising temperatures in our fair city.

Leaving disagreements aside, a group of Tucsonans has developed an alternative concept that addresses the legitimate concerns of all parties: a way to expand the zoo within a reasonable budget, while saving Barnum Hill and its mature tree canopy, the south pond, as well as all existing public green space.

We're calling this alternative 'G-Minor' because it's a variation of the community-preferred concept 'G' (expanding north into an underutilized service area) from among the many choices offered in the city's recently conducted survey.

We propose to extend the zoo north into a paved area now containing prefab metal storage structures that can be readily relocated off-site. Our approach is to reduce costs by minimizing disturbance of existing site features. Here's a written outline of our concept: A. Existing zoo entrance plaza to remain as-is (zero cost).

B. Existing zoo parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

C. Existing solar panel structures to remain as-is (zero cost).

D. Existing therapeutic center to remain as-is (zero cost).

E. Existing communications towers to remain as-is (zero cost).

F. Existing therapeutic pool and associated parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

G. Expand the zoo north into area of underutilized storage buildings (this would be approximately the same cost as Tucson city manager's favored Concept D.

* Additional cost: Replacement of metal storage buildings, which would be approximately $1.5 million.

H. A New over/under concrete arch bridge to connect the zoo expansion and permit pedestrian and service access to pool, ponds and Barnum Hill (cost: two spans at $250,000 each total out to $500,000.

The key to making this work is a pedestrian bridge extending north from the present zoo to the expansion area, while allowing east-west pedestrian traffic beneath it, along with access for required service vehicles.

We have explored the concept and received a cost estimate from an innovative engineer who designs and builds cost-effective thin-shell concrete arched bridges.

Such a bridge, which can be gently sloped for accessibility, would add an exciting element to the zoo experience, and permit the expansion without cutting the park in half. As a bonus this concept preserves the existing 4.3 acres of green space that would be lost under Concept D.

The cost of the bridge is offset by the savings of not having to re-create lost parkland elsewhere. And a bridge is a nice thing! (think of the bridges in NYC's Central Park — and Reid Park is Tucson's Central Park). Pedestrians crossing over would have views of the wider park and pond, plus distant views. Passers-by in the park would see zoo-goers crossing. A bridge becomes a signature element, an amenity for all.

My experience as an architect working with the Arizona/ Sonora Desert Museum tells me that the extra walking distance necessary to cross the bridge is actually an advantage.

One reason the Desert Museum expanded into the Arizona Uplands area was to increase their footprint, to be able to spread visitors out to avoid crowding. Plus, walking is good for us!

And the bridge might include zoo displays, demonstrations and exhibits along its path. In this light the extra distance is an opportunity, which can be accomplished without excessive cost.

In the end, the true value of preserving the heart of Reid Park isn't measured in dollars and cents. It's the environmental benefit of saving the great trees and the open space to be enjoyed by the community, for the common good, while accommodating the needs of the Reid Park Zoo.

Bob Vint is an architect and Tucson native. He's teaches arid region urban design at the University of Arizona School of Architecture.


https://savetheheartofreidpark.org/option-gminor?fbclid=IwAR1icOEf3LTHcSs1GrAtHVQTHU7GR9Oy-4esQdApQqH6DhBS7-iHyecpHSc


Contact information for your City Council Members: 

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/city-government


Tucson City Council votes to expand Reid Park Zoo to the northwest, Tucson.com, May 5, 2021  



Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Share your Priorities at the Mayor's Climate Action and Adaptation Budget Town Hall and Survey

This Saturday, March 20th at 10:30am is the Mayor's Climate Action and Adaptation Budget Town Hall.

Join us and share your priorities for climate action and adaptation.

Link to register: http://bit.ly/3bHDZCk   

Another way to share your priorities...

The City of Tucson is seeking input on priorities for both city government and community-wide climate and environmental sustainability actions. Please, fill out the following survey. 


City of Tucson's Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Community Survey

Sunday, March 14, 2021

Request to Speak on Bills that Hurt the Environment

This week our Arizona Legislators have proposed several bills that can hurt our environment or our ability to advocate for it.

One tool that can help us protect our environment is repealing or rewriting zoning laws that allow anyone to sell their land even if it hurts the neighborhood or the environment. I believe SB1409 zoning ordinances; property rights; cost will make it harder for cities to pass laws that protect their citizens from bad development and encourage unnecessary development.

SB1531 petition signatures is just another bill to make it harder for us to pursue citizens' initiatives - including those that would protect the environment. In our current political reality it is almost impossible to get a 2/3 vote. 

HB2309 violent; disorderly assembly; public order will increase penalties related to a "violent or disorderly assembly." Who gets to decide that? If someone determines that a protest you attended is disorderly you can be charged with a class 6 felony and end up in jail for a minimum of 6 months with no flexibility in sentencing. (Did we learn nothing from the "three strikes" laws?) One of the founding principles of our country is freedom of speech and the ability to protest this kind of tyranny.  
 
There are also several bills that weaken our ability to vote and can impact our ability to pass bills that protect our environment. If you would like to weigh in on them as well, you can find them on this blog.

Please, weigh in on the following bills being heard in committee this week before they go to a vote.

If you had an account with RTS previously, it is still active. If you do not have an account, you can set one up through Civic Engagement Beyond Voting. (Someone will have to help you activate it as it requires going to the Capitol.)

Request to Speak Actions: Safeguard our rights as Arizonans

Apparently some Arizona legislators think that they are the only ones entitled to vote since they keep proposing bills to limit our ability to vote or exercise our constitutional right to enact citizens initiatives or even protest their actions. Please, speak up on RTS to protect our rights in our democracy.

You can weigh in on the following bills being heard in committee this week before they go to a vote.

If you had an account with RTS previously, it is still active. If you do not have an account, you can set one up through Civic Engagement Beyond Voting.  (Someone will have to help you activate it as it requires going to the Capitol.)  



Monday, March 15th

Senate Committee on Government at 2:00 PM

HB2569 elections; private funding; prohibition (Hoffman: Barton, Biasiucci, et al) prohibits the state or other public bodies from utilizing any private dollars to help conduct or administer elections. This would severely hamstring the state and counties as they receive private grants and in-kind support to fund election work as the legislature does not adequately fund it. OPPOSE.
HCR2023 elections; state authority; infringement; opposition (Hoffman: Barton, Biasiucci, et al) says the AZ Legislature opposes the federal government interfering with the legislature's authority over elections and urges Congress to oppose HR1, a bill that would limit voter suppression and provide for automatic voter registration for federal elections, prohibit improper voter list purges, including based on not voting in a recent election, and prohibit requiring additional identification (beyond a signature) when voting by mail. OPPOSE.

SCR1024 initiatives; tax increases; vote requirement (Petersen) refers to the voters a measure to require a two-thirds vote for certain initiatives and referenda that include tax increases. This is a reaction to Prop. 208. OPPOSE.


SB1003 early voting; signature required; notice (Ugenti-Rita) limits curing an early ballot with a missing signature to 7:00 PM on Election Day. Currently, they can take several days to contact voters to let them know they forgot to sign and allow them an opportunity to sign. This is unnecessarily restrictive. OPPOSE.
SB1010 (now: recounts; requests; procedures; audits) (Mesnard) increases the minimum number of precincts in a post-election hand counts and allows individuals to file an action and bond in Superior Court for a recount of any election or portion of an election that is not subject to an automatic recount. So, people with money can challenge any election and demand a recount? OPPOSE.
SB1409 zoning ordinances; property rights; costs (Petersen) requires cities to consider impacts on the costs of housing before adopting any zoning ordinance or zoning ordinance text amendment. While not as bad as it was, it is still intended to limit protective actions by the cities. OPPOSE.
SB1497 ballot measures; proposition 105; disclosure (Ugenti-Rita) requires the official ballot and the publicity pamphlet to include a Proposition 105 notice. This notice will appear right above both the first statutory measure and also right above the first referendum. The notice states, "NOTICE: PURSUANT TO PROPOSITION 105 (1998), THESE MEASURES CANNOT BE CHANGED IN THE FUTURE IF APPROVED ON THE BALLOT EXCEPT BY A THREE-FOURTHS VOTE OF THE MEMBERS OF EACH HOUSE OF THE LEGISLATURE AND IF THE CHANGE FURTHERS THE PURPOSE OF THE ORIGINAL BALLOT MEASURE, OR BY REFERRING THE CHANGE TO THE BALLOT." The Legislature should absolutely not put this on the actual ballot. The ballot is no place for messaging, analysis, etc. That belongs in campaign literature and in some cases may be appropriate for the publicity pamphlet. We do not put any other notices on the actual ballot, including fiscal analysis, why include this? OPPOSE.
SB1531 petition signatures; description; invalidity (Mesnard: Leach) voids the signature of any initiative or referendum petition signer that signs the petition without either hearing or reading the initiative or referendum description printed on the petition. This is another ridiculous requirement.
What if you actually had read the measure? Why should you have to read or hear the description? It also says the circulator has to cross out a signature if they think the person did not read or listen to the description. OPPOSE.


HB2309 violent; disorderly assembly; public order (Roberts: Barton, Biasiucci, et al) defines a violent and disorderly assembly as when a gathering of seven or more people, with the intent of engaging in a riot, causes damage to property or injures another person; makes participating in a disorderly assembly a class 6 felony; and targets protesters by increasing the penalties of lower level offenses to a felony if part of a gathering. This is clearly targeting the movement for Black Lives and people of color. OPPOSE.

Monday, March 8, 2021

REQUEST TO SPEAK ACTIONS for week of March 8th

The Arizona Historic Capitol at night.
Please sign in on the Request to Speak (RTS) system to oppose SB1429, SB1485, HB2577, HB2691, and HB2714.

Please sign in to support HB2623 and HCR2034.

If you had an account with RTS previously, it is still active. Sign in, click Request to Speak, click New Request, then cut and paste the bill number, weigh in for or against the bill while it is still in committee. You can leave a short comment explaining your position. Click "no" on Do you wish to speak? - unless you want to speak in person. Click New Request to weigh in on the next bill. Repeat as needed.

If you do not have an account, go ahead and set one up, but someone will have to help you activate it as it requires going to the Capitol. Reach out to Civic Engagement Beyond Voting to sign you up.

https://www.cebv.us/rts.html