Monday, May 10, 2021

Stop Arizona bill that will roll back tobacco prevention laws. Contact your Arizona reps now.


The Arizona House of Representatives is about to vote on a very bad bill. Backed by the tobacco industry, HB-2682 would roll back local tobacco prevention laws across the state and ban Arizona communities from passing new ones!

We have to stop it from passing. Please contact your state representative ASAP:

In communities across Arizona, parents, teachers, doctors, and local elected officials have come together to decide what's best for their kids, passing laws that protect them from tobacco products and tobacco industry targeting. HB-2682 would undo this work, decimate local tobacco control efforts, and give the tobacco industry free reign in our state. It's truly a gift to Big Tobacco.

And it's especially egregious as Arizona faces a new youth nicotine addiction crisis, with 1 in 5 high school students now using e-cigarettes.

This bad bill just passed the state Senate! The House is now expected to vote on final passage as early as TODAY, March 10th.

This is our last chance to stop it before it goes to Governor Ducey's desk.

Send a message to your state representative ASAP today telling them to reject HB-2682 >>

Monday, May 3, 2021

How to literally bridge park zoo

 

The following column is the opinion and analysis of the writer:

BOB VINT

Special to the Arizona Daily Star

Our community has been roiled in recent months by a controversy over the proposed expansion of Tucson's Reid Park Zoo into sensitive areas of Reid Park.

We can't agree on whether Barnum Hill is a just a pile of dirt standing in the way of progress, or a special place full of memories for thousands of Tucsonans. City officials are cognizant of their responsibility to spend tax dollars wisely, while activists advocate for preserving the majestic old trees, aquatic wildlife and public green space to counteract the heat island effect raising temperatures in our fair city.

Leaving disagreements aside, a group of Tucsonans has developed an alternative concept that addresses the legitimate concerns of all parties: a way to expand the zoo within a reasonable budget, while saving Barnum Hill and its mature tree canopy, the south pond, as well as all existing public green space.

We're calling this alternative 'G-Minor' because it's a variation of the community-preferred concept 'G' (expanding north into an underutilized service area) from among the many choices offered in the city's recently conducted survey.

We propose to extend the zoo north into a paved area now containing prefab metal storage structures that can be readily relocated off-site. Our approach is to reduce costs by minimizing disturbance of existing site features. Here's a written outline of our concept: A. Existing zoo entrance plaza to remain as-is (zero cost).

B. Existing zoo parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

C. Existing solar panel structures to remain as-is (zero cost).

D. Existing therapeutic center to remain as-is (zero cost).

E. Existing communications towers to remain as-is (zero cost).

F. Existing therapeutic pool and associated parking lot to remain as-is (zero cost).

G. Expand the zoo north into area of underutilized storage buildings (this would be approximately the same cost as Tucson city manager's favored Concept D.

* Additional cost: Replacement of metal storage buildings, which would be approximately $1.5 million.

H. A New over/under concrete arch bridge to connect the zoo expansion and permit pedestrian and service access to pool, ponds and Barnum Hill (cost: two spans at $250,000 each total out to $500,000.

The key to making this work is a pedestrian bridge extending north from the present zoo to the expansion area, while allowing east-west pedestrian traffic beneath it, along with access for required service vehicles.

We have explored the concept and received a cost estimate from an innovative engineer who designs and builds cost-effective thin-shell concrete arched bridges.

Such a bridge, which can be gently sloped for accessibility, would add an exciting element to the zoo experience, and permit the expansion without cutting the park in half. As a bonus this concept preserves the existing 4.3 acres of green space that would be lost under Concept D.

The cost of the bridge is offset by the savings of not having to re-create lost parkland elsewhere. And a bridge is a nice thing! (think of the bridges in NYC's Central Park — and Reid Park is Tucson's Central Park). Pedestrians crossing over would have views of the wider park and pond, plus distant views. Passers-by in the park would see zoo-goers crossing. A bridge becomes a signature element, an amenity for all.

My experience as an architect working with the Arizona/ Sonora Desert Museum tells me that the extra walking distance necessary to cross the bridge is actually an advantage.

One reason the Desert Museum expanded into the Arizona Uplands area was to increase their footprint, to be able to spread visitors out to avoid crowding. Plus, walking is good for us!

And the bridge might include zoo displays, demonstrations and exhibits along its path. In this light the extra distance is an opportunity, which can be accomplished without excessive cost.

In the end, the true value of preserving the heart of Reid Park isn't measured in dollars and cents. It's the environmental benefit of saving the great trees and the open space to be enjoyed by the community, for the common good, while accommodating the needs of the Reid Park Zoo.

Bob Vint is an architect and Tucson native. He's teaches arid region urban design at the University of Arizona School of Architecture.


https://savetheheartofreidpark.org/option-gminor?fbclid=IwAR1icOEf3LTHcSs1GrAtHVQTHU7GR9Oy-4esQdApQqH6DhBS7-iHyecpHSc


Contact information for your City Council Members: 

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/city-government


Tucson City Council votes to expand Reid Park Zoo to the northwest, Tucson.com, May 5, 2021