Saturday, February 24, 2024

Urge your legislators to vote NO on bills that attack environmental actions, water protections and a few innocent bystanders

Brace yourself. There are so many bad bills advancing at our state legislature that I am including the Sierra Club's recommended actions in this post.

Next week, the House will start hearing Senate bills and the Senate will start hearing House bills. They will continue to vote on the hundreds of bills on the Floor of each house, too.
 

No new Request to Speak actions this week - if you've been keeping up.  If you haven't, please, check last week's post for the bill numbers. 

See the Call-in and Petition actions from the Sierra Club below... 

The "Billapalooza" of bad policy advanced an incredible number of bad bills on multiple levels, including racist measures, prohibitions and preemptions on climate action, anti-democracy bills, and a plethora of harmful water bills. In addition to all of that, they advanced the bills to try and remove protections from public lands and objected to sustainability goals such as ending poverty. 

HB2788 United Nations; sustainable development; prohibition (Jones: Biasiucci, Bliss, et al.) prohibiting Arizona or any of its political subdivisions from adopting the sustainable development agenda of the United Nations, which means they are objecting to support for ending poverty, support for achieving food security, ensuring healthy lives, achieving gender equality, and protecting the planet and our ability to live on it by objecting to action on climate change and promoting water sustainability. Passed House Committee of the Whole (COW) and awaits a Third Read vote.


HCR2040 public monies; prohibited expenditures (Smith: Biasiucci, Carbone, et al.) was amended in House COW to add a prohibition on the floor to add prohibitions on any kind of affirmative action in hiring. HCR2040 refers to the ballot a measure to prohibit the state or any political subdivision, including universities, to do anything to help reduce global temperatures, have a climate action plan, participate in anything related to reducing meat consumption, etc. It wraps this up with a bow related to prohibiting "furthering Marxist ideologies." It is clearly intended to connect all of these issues and motivate voters who fear that there is a vast conspiracy to make this a better world. It awaits a Third Read vote. 

Two comparable measures, SCR1015 and SB1195 are on the Senate COW calendar for Monday

Call your representatives and ask them to oppose HB2788 and HCR2040 and call your Senators and ask them to oppose SCR1015 and SB1195.
 
Speaker Toma's anti-immigrant measure, HCR2060, which expands the provisions of the horribly racist SB1070, passed out of the House along party lines. You can read more about it here. It sure would be nice if some of those businesses would speak out against this.

Please also ask your representatives to vote no on HCR2050 energy source; restriction; prohibition (Griffin: Biasiucci, Bliss, et al). It refers to the ballot a proposed constitutional amendment to prohibit a city, town, county or any other political subdivision of the state from restricting the manufacture, use or sale of a device based on the energy source that is either used to power the device or consumed by the device. Device is not defined, but this is clearly intended to preclude any limits on fossil fuels, including gas. This will make it harder to protect our air, our water, our health, and our communities. Thank you to Representative Oscar de los Santos for speaking up against this bad policy. You can hear his remarks and the ridiculous response to them here

 

You can find contact information for all legislators here.
 

Protect Public Lands and Waters

https://act.sierraclub.org/actions/Arizona?actionId=AR0421094

The Arizona Legislature is again launching an attack on public lands and waters via a series of bills and memorials (messages to Congress and the President) asking that no more lands or waters be protected and that current protections be rescinded, and seeking to require legislative permission to protect any additional federal public land.

Please send a message to your Arizona Representatives asking them to vote NO on all of these bills!

The Arizona Legislature also has a large number of bills that weaken water protections. Please send your representatives a message to oppose bills that create more loopholes and that allow for more pumping of precious groundwater.

Ask your representatives to vote NO on harmful water bills.

Saturday, February 17, 2024

Urge your Reps to vote "No" on bills that hurt public lands

Bad bill from AZ heading to Washington?! 

After the super long list of bad bills last week, this week's Call to Action is much easier! We've earned it. 

I've included a condensed update taken from the Sierra Club (below) on what went on in the Arizona Legislature last week. But our Call to Action consists of signing the Sierra Club's petition and supporting one bill on the Request to Speak system.

 
https://act.sierraclub.org/actions/Arizona?actionId=AR0419791

If you would also like to contact your Representative personally, you can find their contact information here: https://www.azleg.gov/MemberRoster/ 

NOTE: Your Reps should be indicated on the petition. But you can look up your district here:  https://irc-az.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/lookup/index.html?appid=424810a4667049388ef6df4f0c73098b

Sign in on the Request to Speak System to support SCR1038.

SCR1038 Arizona state parks heritage fund (Kerr: Shope, Carbone, et al) refers to the ballot a measure to fund the Arizona State Parks Heritage Fund from the state lottery for $10 million per year. This basically is reinstating the original funding for this program.

Sign onto the RTS app:
https://apps.azleg.gov/account/signon

Review RTS directions:
https://desktopactivisttucson.blogspot.com/2018/03/request-to-speak-time.html


LEGISLATIVE UPDATE:

This week was challenging as the Arizona Legislature advanced an incredible list of truly awful legislation, targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion; objecting to sustainability in all forms; undermining clean energy; sending messages to repeal a national monument and the law that allows them -- the Antiquities Act; and advancing bills to weaken our water laws.

On Thursday, the House Government Committee passed HB2788 United Nations; sustainable development; prohibition (Jones: Biasiucci, Bliss, et al.) prohibiting Arizona or any of its political subdivisions from adopting the sustainable development agenda of the United Nations, listed above, which means they are objecting to support for ending poverty, support for achieving food security, ensuring healthy lives, achieving gender equality, and protecting the planet and our ability to live on it by objecting to action on climate change and promoting water sustainability.  FYI see UN Sustainable Development Goals (below.) 
They also advanced SB1195, SCR1015, and HCR2040 to prohibit spending dollars on climate, reducing traffic, and a lot more. SCR1015 and HCR2040 would go to the ballot..

Monday, February 12, 2024

New Transit Schedules for Sun Tran, Sun Express & Sun Shuttle

Resharing City of Tucson post...

Sun Tran, Sun Express and Sun Shuttle are rolling out new transit schedules beginning Sunday, February 25


All Sun Tran and Sun Express routes will have schedule changes.


Sun Tran Route 3 will have a routing change:

  • Routing change from 4th Avenue to Stone Avenue and Toole Avenue
  • Stops added: Northwest 6th Street/Herbert Avenue, and North East and South East of Toole Avenue/7th Avenue


Sun Shuttle



The following Sun Shuttle routes will have schedule changes: 413, 421X, 440, 450


Sun Shuttle has added a new trip, also known as timepoint, to Route 413 at Ina Road/La Cholla Boulevard, and Route 440 for the northbound Wednesday schedule.


Sun Shuttle Route 486 Ajo is now Operated by National Express, including Dial-a-Ride services. Dial-a-Ride customers can call (520) 441-6545 or 1(800) 242-9483 to schedule services. This change will NOT affect any service schedules.


You can find all schedule changes and download routes HERE! Need help trip planning? Call Customer Service (520) 792-9222. Translation Assistance is available by calling Customer Service, pression 03 and saying what language you need in English.

Nuevos horarios de tránsito para Sun Tran, Sun Express y Sun Shuttle


Sun Tran, Sun Express y Sun Shuttle implementarán nuevos horarios de tránsito a partir del domingo 25 de febrero.


Todas las rutas de Sun Tran y Sun Express tendrán cambios de horario.


La Ruta 3 de Sun Tran tendrá un cambio de ruta:

  • Cambio de ruta de Avenida 4to a Avenida Stone y Avenida Toole
  • Paradas agregadas: Noroeste de la calle 6to/Avenida Herbert, noreste y sureste de la Avenida Toole/7mo Avenida


Sun Shuttle

Las siguientes rutas de Sun Shuttle tendrán cambios de horario: 413, 421X, 440, 450


Sun Shuttle ha agregado un nuevo viaje, también conocido como punto de tiempo, a la Ruta 413 en el camino de Ina/La Cholla Bulevar, y a la Ruta 440 para el horario del miércoles en dirección norte.


La Ruta 486 de Sun Shuttle Ajo ahora es operada por National Express, incluidos los servicios Dial-a-Ride. Los clientes del Dial-a-Ride pueden llamar al (520) 441-6545 o al 1(800) 242-9483 para programar servicios. Este cambion NO afectará ningún horario de servicio.


¡Puedes encontrar todos los cambios de horarios y descargar rutas AQUÍ! ¿Necesita ayuda para planificar su viaje? Llame a Servicio al Cliente (520) 792-9222. La asistencia de traducción está disponible llamando a Servicio al Cliente, presionando 03 y diciendo qué idioma necesita en inglés.

Saturday, February 10, 2024

Another week, another batch of bad bills to oppose on RTS

 

This week there are even more bad bills than last week. Please, push back by weighing in on as many as you can using the Request to Speak system. There are bad water bills, measures to undermine wind and solar, and bills to try to limit land conservation. There is even a message bill to repeal the Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni-Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument, a widely and strongly supported designation that protects lands around the Grand Canyon from future uranium mining and development. I know it’s a lot. Please, do what you can. You might want to do the bills being heard in committee on Monday and Tuesday first and then do the bills for Wednesday and Thursday in a second pass.

Sign onto the RTS app:
https://apps.azleg.gov/account/signon

Review RTS directions:
https://desktopactivisttucson.blogspot.com/2018/03/request-to-speak-time.html

Monday, February 12th


Land, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs Committee at 2 p.m. 

  • HB2865 natural resource conservation districts; board (Griffin: Diaz, Dunn) establishes the State Natural Resource Conservation Board and transfers oversight of natural resource conservation districts from the State Land Commissioner to a board of district officials and citizens that will make all the decisions regarding natural resource conservation. While it sounds like a good way to ensure local input in practice it will create more bureaucracy that will prevent effective action to protect natural resources. OPPOSE
  • HCM2004 federal land acquisition; acreage return (Smith: Biasiucci, Carbone, et al) is a message to Congress and the President, asking them to enact legislation that requires the federal government to give to a state or county one acre of federal land for every acre the federal government reserves from the respective state or county. This is an anti-public lands protection message. OPPOSE
  • HCM2005 federal lands; transfer to states (Smith: Biasiucci, Carbone, et al) asks the Congress and President to pass legislation to convey 30 percent of public lands to the states. Arizona has 9.2 million acres of state trust land that it cannot seem to manage properly -- it is not equipped to do so. Besides, it's pretty clear the intent with this is to have more land to exploit. OPPOSE
  • HCM2006 federal lands; natural resources; permission (Griffin) asks Congress to enact legislation to prohibit the federal government from establishing, authorizing or declaring any new national monument, national park, wildlife refuge, conservation area, area of critical environmental concern, wild and scenic river, wilderness, wilderness characteristic area or any other federal reservation or special use designation in Arizona and from withdrawing or reserving any additional federal mineral, land, water or other national resource rights within Arizona's border. This is just more anti-conservation propaganda. OPPOSE
  • HCM2007 Grand Canyon Footprints monument; repeal(Biasiucci: Carter, Chaplik, et al) asks the President to rescind or revoke the designation of the Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni - Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument and not to do any more monuments or special protections unless the legislature agrees to it. OPPOSE
  • HCM2008 urging Congress; Antiquities Act; repeal (Gillette: Biasiucci, Cook, et al) asks the Congress and the President to repeal the Antiquities Act, which is the act that authorizes the President to establish national monuments. OPPOSE 

Transportation, Technology, & Missing Children Committee at 2:00 PM

  • SB1282 highways; bicycle paths; walkways; prohibition (Hoffman: Wadsack, Chaplik, et al) prohibits the Arizona Department of Transportation from accepting federal monies conditioned on, planning, designing or constructing bicycle paths or pedestrian walkways that are parallel to and separate from a highway or state route. OPPOSE

Finance and Commerce Committee at 2:00 PM

  • SB1665 municipal development; permits; review (Gowan) allows for private review of building permits if the city does not act in 15 days. Makes it much easier for developers to push through permits without adequate review by municipalities.  OPPOSE

Tuesday, February 13th

House Natural Resources, Energy, and Water Committee at 2:00 PM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • HB2018 subsequent irrigation non-expansion area; removal (Griffin) requires the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) Director to review all subsequent irrigation non-expansion areas (INA) periodically to determine whether the areas continue to meet the criteria for INA designation and to remove the subsequent INA designation if the ADWR determines the area no longer meets specified criteria. INAs limit additional agricultural acreage from being irrigated. This bill raises the bar for establishing a new INA by petition, requiring it be signed by 10% of the voters in the area who also receive their drinking water from that basin. The problem with this is that it disenfranchises those who have already been harmed by over pumping of groundwater, whose wells may have dried up, and who are hauling water to meet their drinking water needs. It allows the big pumpers to petition for removal of an INA, requiring just 25 irrigation users to petition. This bill is clearly intended to make it more difficult to establish additional INAs and to also make it easier to remove them. OPPOSE
  • HB2030 cities; towns; water service; audit (Griffin) This is an anti-Tucson bill. It is requiring Tucson Water to be audited by a third party as a result of their conservation measures. The city must pay for an audit that will tie up city staff to answer these unnecessary questions. OPPOSE
  • HB2061 subsequent active management area; removal (Griffin) It makes it way too easy for a small percentage of people to petition for removal of AMA protection. You only have to get 10 percent of the voters to go for it. They could easily reverse the new Douglas AMA.  OPPOSE
  • HB2127 assured water supply certificate; effluent (Griffin) allows a subdivision in an AMA to use effluent from the subdivision to meet its assured water supply designation. The problem is that effluent can’t completely replace the amount of water withdrawn, so it’s not an assured water supply. OPPOSE 
  • HB2646 power plants; public service corporations (Bliss) Includes unworkable requirements for closing fossil fuel power plants and requires the attorney general to be engaged in opposing any federal rules that expedite the closure of fossil fuels plants. OPPOSE 
  • HCR2003 groundwater management; technical correction (Griffin) Strike everything: sale housing. This is asking for a ballot initiative to gut the management requirements for an AMA. They are allowing developers to build without having enough groundwater. OPPOSE
  • HCR2050 energy source; restriction; prohibition (Griffin: Biasiucci, Bliss, et al) refers to the ballot a proposed constitutional amendment to prohibit a city, town, county or any other political subdivision of the state from restricting the use of any source of energy. This is a fossil fuels protection act. OPPOSE
  • HCR2051 rural communities; groundwater; tools (Griffin) resolves that the legislature will continue to provide rural Arizona with an "abundance of tools" to manage groundwater. Except they aren't. This is pure propaganda and misinformation. OPPOSE

Wednesday, February 14th - Happy Statehood Day!

Senate Committee on Government at 9:00 AM

House Government Committee at 9:00 AM

  • HB2788 United Nations; sustainable development: prohibition (Jones: Biasiucci, Bliss et al.) prohibits cities, towns, and counties or the state or any political subdivision of the state from spending funding on adopting or implementing any of the sustainability goals included in the United Nations 2030 Goals for Sustainable Development. OPPOSE
  • HCM2002 national guard; mobilization; border (Montenegro) asks the governor to deploy national guard to the border, promoting militarization of the border. OPPOSE 

House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee at 1:30 PM

House Regulatory Affairs Committee at 2:00 PM

  • HCR2052 rulemaking; legislative approval (McGarr: Gillette, Griffin, et al.) refers to the ballot a measure that would require the legislature to approve any rulemaking. This is an attempt to impede efforts by the governor. It also has some separation of powers issue. OPPOSE

​​​​Thursday, February 15th

Senate Natural Resources. Energy, Water Committee.
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • SB1041 groundwater savings certificate; assured water (Hoffman: Kern, Wadsack, et al) appears to be another way around the assured water supply requirements. It requires the Arizona Department of Water Resources to issue a groundwater savings certificate for development with a gray water system. The bill does not require the savings from gray water to be equal to the groundwater extraction. OPPOSE
  • SB1241 tax credit; gray water systems (Shope: Kerr) establishes a tax credit of up to $5,000 for installation of a gray water system. It caps total tax credits for this program at $25 million per year. SUPPORT
  • SB1243 groundwater sales; online exchange (Wadsack: Bolick, Hoffman, et al) allows those in the Phoenix, Pinal, and Tucson active management areas who have grandfathered water rights to sell, lease, or convey the water or the rights to others in any of these active management areas. It requires a cut to the aquifer of 35 percent. There are several issues with this bill. It could exacerbate over pumping in certain areas and could result in increased pumping. OPPOSE
  • SB1430 wind farms; location limits (Rogers) prohibits wind farms from being located within six miles of property that is not owned by the entity that owns the land on which the wind farm is being erected unless the property owner gives their permission. This is just a measure to stop wind power generation. There is no such requirement for polluting gas and coal plants. OPPOSE
  • SB1649 misbranding; misrepresenting; food products (Bennett) limits labeling products as "meat" if they don't come from animals. OPPOSE
  • SCR1038 Arizona state parks heritage fund (Kerr: Shope, Carbone, et al) refers to the ballot a measure to fund the Arizona State Parks Heritage Fund from the state lottery for $10 million per year. This basically is reinstating the original funding for this program. SUPPORT

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Urgent Action on SB1221: Basin Management Areas will make water shortages worse in rural Arizona

Sink hole in Willcox area

I just got an email from Sandy Bahr at the Sierra Club: SB1221 regarding Basin Management Areas will hurt rural Arizona. (See her comment below.)  Included are 2 documents that explain how bad this bill is.

SB1221 basin management areas; appropriation (Kerr: Griffin) establishes a process for creating basin management areas via a petition with signatures from 15 percent of the registered voters that live in the basin and receive their drinking water from the basin. These can only be established if land subsidence is endangering property or affecting water storage, and there is an accelerated decline in groundwater levels. This would be too difficult to pass until it is too late. Why wait until the situation is critical?

If you haven't already, please sign onto the Request to Speak and oppose SB1221.

Sign onto the RTS app:
https://apps.azleg.gov/account/signon

Review RTS directions:
https://desktopactivisttucson.blogspot.com/2018/03/request-to-speak-time.html

If you already weighed in on RTS, consider contacting the members of the Senate Natural Resources. Energy, Water Committee before the bill goes for a vote in the committee at 9:00 AM and urge them to vote NO on SB1221 to protect rural groundwater. If the committee member is the representative of your district, please, mention that you are their constituent and from (city). 

Sen. Frank Carroll (Republican, District 28): FCARROLL@azleg.gov, 602-926-3374

Sen. Brian Fernandez (Democrat, District 23): BFERNANDEZ@azleg.gov, 602-926-3098

Sen. David Gowan (Republican, District 19): DGOWAN@azleg.gov, 602-926-5154

Chairman Sine Kerr (Majority Whip, Rep, District 25): SKERR@azleg.gov , 602-926-5955

Sen. Juan Mendez (Dem, Assist. Minority Leader, Dist. 8): JMENDEZ@azleg.gov , 620-926-4124

Vice-Chairman Thomas "T.J." Shope (Rep. President Pro Tempore, D 16) TSHOPE@azleg.gov, 602-926-3012

Sen. Priya Sundareshan (Democrat, District 18) PSUNDARESHAN@azleg.gov, 602-926-3437 (Priya is an Environmental Lawyer, UA professor and champion for water.)

Email from Sandy Bahr:

I wanted to give you a heads up that this bill is being heard on Thursday and would have negative implications for Oak Flat as it locks in groundwater mining outside of AMAs. Attached are some info sheets on the process. If you can sign in against it, we encourage you to do so. 

https://apps.azleg.gov/RequestToSpeak 

SB1221 would create new rules for groundwater basins (the geographic areas overlying water-storing aquifers). Under SB1221, “Basin Management Areas” or “BMAs” could be created and would bring new groundwater laws for communities in the basin. But these new laws would not require a stop to groundwater overpumping. Instead, they would lock overpumping in place (pages 4-5) and make it nearly impossible to stop the decline. While the bill would require a cut to the aquifer for transfers or changes to groundwater certificates (page 5), the only way to require a reduction across a BMA would be to upgrade the BMA to an “Active” BMA. Even then, an Active BMA could only reduce pumping by 2% per year, capped at a total of 10% reduction—and only if the Active BMA council unanimously agrees to require that reduction. (Page 10).

Saturday, February 3, 2024

Request to Speak on Crazy Bills at the State Legislature

Crazy legislator making trouble for Tucson

This week there are 20 bad bills to weigh in on the Request to Speak system. I understand that is a lot. You might want to complete the ones being heard in committee during the first half of the week first and come back to do the rest later. Or maybe you want to prioritize doing all the water bills now to make sure you don’t forget. (The water bills are being heard on Tuesday and Thursday.)

On Wednesday there are 4 bad voting bills (in addition to some crazy bills that don’t allow agencies or universities to work on climate solutions.) The reason I include the voting bills is because if we can’t vote, we can’t advocate for the environment.

Maybe you have other priorities. Please, do what you can. There are some crazy politicians out there that are proposing some crazy bills and have lots of crazy followers who are supporting their bills. We need to show Governor Hobbs that we support her vetoes if it comes to that.

Sign onto the RTS app:
https://apps.azleg.gov/account/signon

Review RTS directions:
https://desktopactivisttucson.blogspot.com/2018/03/request-to-speak-time.html

Register for the RTS system here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScdjBMoAJrjHD57GGegmdUCKAowcr93K4vQA6a7_AjyElBtrQ/viewform

Monday, February 5th

Land, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs Committee at 2:00PM

Senate Elections Committee at 2:00PM

  • SB1131 low voter turnout elections; repeat (Kavanagh) requires local elections in which less than 25 percent of eligible registered voters vote to be repeated on the next statewide or federal election ballot. This will cause huge issues for local government and leave things in limbo as they await the do over. It also costs more money and disenfranchises the people who did vote in the election.  OPPOSE

Tuesday, February 6th

House Natural Resources, Energy, and Water Committee at 2:00 PM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • HB2020 long-term storage; stormwater; rainwater; rules (Griffin) It allows developers to receive credit for putting in infrastructure (even roads) that they project will recharge stormwater. That infrastructure is exempt from the management requirements of an AMA. The developer doesn’t have to demonstrate that recharge occurs. OPPOSE
  • HB2060 irrigation non-expansion area; substitution; acres (Griffin) In an Irrigation Non-expansion Area (INA) an owner can retire irrigated acres and substitute them for others and then use the water for any purpose including putting in a development. This goes against the spirit and intent of the INAs. OPPOSE
  • HB2063 exempt wells; certificate; groundwater use (Griffin) requires the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) to issue a certificate of water rights to those with exempt wells (35 gallons per minute or less) that register the well with ADWR. This appears to be another loophole in AMA management. OPPOSE
  • HB2545 annual vehicle emissions testing; exemption (Jones: Gillette, Kolodin, et al) says that vehicles manufactured after 2018 are exempt from emissions testing. There is no way to see if someone has modified the new car to have more emissions and there is no expiration date so eventually the new cars will be old cars. Basically, they are saying that no car on the road requires emissions testing. OPPOSE
  • HB2546 vehicle emissions; exemption (Jones: Gillette, Kolodin, et al) Essentially from 2018 on no car will be subject to emissions testing.  OPPOSE
  • HB2647 physical availability credits; water supply (Smith: Griffin) allows a landowner who has an irrigation grandfathered right in an active management area to retire the land from irrigation but retain a physical availability credit to non-irrigation use of the land. This specifically gets around assured water supply requirements for subdivisions in AMAs and allows continued groundwater mining without any replenishment. There must be replenishment when the irrigation grandfathered right is converted to a new credit as merely slowing the rate of groundwater depletion is not enough. OPPOSE

House Commerce Committee at 2:00 PM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • HB2297 adaptive reuse; commercial buildings; zoning (Biasiucci: Bliss, Carbone, et al) S/E: same subject. This strike everything amendment allows the construction of multi-family dwellings that doesn’t comply with local zoning requirements. OPPOSE
  • HCM2001 reevaluate restrictions; chemical industry (Willoughby) objects to new regulations on the chemical industry. It's unclear just which regulations they are including in their objections, but one area the Biden Administration has been taking action on is relative to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), otherwise known as "forever chemicals" that cause harmful health impacts. OPPOSE

Wednesday, February 7th

Senate Committee on Government at 9:00 AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • SB1195 public monies; prohibited uses  (Kern) is a wacky bill. It says no public entity -- this would include any agencies, universities, etc. -- can promote, advocate, or plan for or belong to an organization that does anything relating to reducing meat and dairy consumption, reducing or replacing vehicle travel with walking, biking, or public transit, reusing water for human consumption that has touched human feces (note that would eliminate the Colorado River), reducing  greenhouse gas emissions or tracking any information to determine consumption based emissions, limiting the increase of the average global  temperature or producing a climate action plan, and a bunch more ridiculous provisions. In addition to being really wacky, if passed, it would tie the hands of agencies, cities, and universities relative to doing anything about climate change or doing things to clean up our air by reducing vehicle travel. OPPOSE
  • SCR1015 public monies; prohibited expenditures (Kern) refers to the ballot the provisions of the bill above, SB1195. OPPOSE

House Committee on Government at 9:00 AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

House Municipal Oversight & Elections at 2:00 PM in HHR4
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • HB2405 voter registrations; recorder; inactive status (Gillette: Biasiucci, Bliss, et al) allows a county recorder to declare a person's voter registration status as inactive, disenfranchising more voters. OPPOSE
  • HB2719 bond elections; date; voter turnout (Carbone: Biasiucci, Dunn, et al) requires a number of things relative to bond elections, including that there must at least be a 60 percent turnout for the bond to be issued. Currently, less than 50% of registered voters participate in Arizona elections, so this would make it impossible for cities to pass any bonds It also says that elections can only be held on even years and Tucson holds elections on odd and even years, so this seems to be an attack on Tucson. OPPOSE
  • HCR2028 elections; signature verification process (Kolodin: McGarr, Rogers) refers to the ballot a signature verification process that can result in disqualifying more voters. OPPOSE
  • HCR2040 public monies; prohibited expenditures (Smith: Biasiucci, Carbone, et al) is the same as SCR1015 (see above). OPPOSE

​​​​Thursday, February 8th

Senate Natural Resources. Energy, Water Committee at 9:00 AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here.

  • Presentations
    • Overview of CAP - Brenda Burman, General Manager of Central Arizona Project
    • Arizona Golf Water Stewardship - Rob Collins, Chairman of Arizona Alliance for Golf Water Committee
  • SB1221 basin management areas; appropriation (Kerr: Griffin) establishes a process for creating basin management areas via a petition with signatures from 15 percent of the registered voters that live in the basin and receive their drinking water from the basin. These can only be established if land subsidence is endangering property or affecting water storage, and there is an accelerated decline in groundwater levels. This would be too difficult to pass until is too late. Why wait until the situation is critical? . OPPOSE
  • SB1242 ADWR; application; review; time frames (Shope: Kerr) Cuts the time frame for ADWR to review applications for assured water supply certificates nearly in half. This doesn’t allow enough time for ADWR to do a thorough review. OPPOSE
  • SB1289 DWR; hydrology reports (Hoffman) requires the Governor and the Department of Water Resources to provide a report on the hydrology of an active management area to the House and Senate Natural Resource, Energy, and Water committees 30 days before it is issued. There is no reason that the legislature should be reviewing the hydrology report before it is published. Are they hydrologists?  OPPOSE