Crazy legislator making trouble for Tucson |
This week there are 20 bad bills to weigh in on the Request to Speak system. I
understand that is a lot. You might want to complete the ones being heard in
committee during the first half of the week first and come back to do the rest
later. Or maybe you want to prioritize doing all the water bills now to make
sure you don’t forget. (The water bills are being heard on Tuesday and
Thursday.)
On Wednesday there are 4 bad voting bills (in addition to some crazy bills that
don’t allow agencies or universities to work on climate solutions.) The reason
I include the voting bills is because if we can’t vote, we can’t advocate for the
environment.
Maybe you have other priorities. Please, do what you can. There are some crazy politicians
out there that are proposing some crazy bills and have lots of crazy followers
who are supporting their bills. We need to show Governor Hobbs that we support
her vetoes if it comes to that.
Sign onto the RTS app:
https://apps.azleg.gov/account/signon
Review RTS directions:
https://desktopactivisttucson.blogspot.com/2018/03/request-to-speak-time.html
Register for the RTS system here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScdjBMoAJrjHD57GGegmdUCKAowcr93K4vQA6a7_AjyElBtrQ/viewform
Monday,
February 5th
Land, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs Committee at 2:00PM
- HB2121 cell-cultured animal product; prohibition (Marshall:
Bliss, Cook, et al) prohibits and establishes penalties for selling a
cell-cultured animal product for human or animal consumption to protect
the livestock industry. OPPOSE
Senate
Elections Committee at 2:00PM
- SB1131 low voter turnout elections; repeat (Kavanagh)
requires local elections in which less than 25 percent of eligible
registered voters vote to be repeated on the next statewide or federal
election ballot. This will cause huge issues for local government and
leave things in limbo as they await the do over. It also costs more money
and disenfranchises the people who did vote in the election. OPPOSE
Tuesday,
February 6th
House Natural Resources, Energy, and Water Committee at
2:00 PM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the
meeting here.
- HB2020 long-term storage; stormwater; rainwater; rules (Griffin)
It allows developers to receive credit for putting in infrastructure (even
roads) that they project will recharge stormwater. That infrastructure is
exempt from the management requirements of an AMA. The developer doesn’t
have to demonstrate that recharge occurs. OPPOSE
- HB2060 irrigation non-expansion area; substitution;
acres (Griffin) In an Irrigation Non-expansion
Area (INA) an owner can retire irrigated acres and substitute them for
others and then use the water for any purpose including putting in a
development. This goes against the spirit and intent of the INAs. OPPOSE
- HB2063 exempt wells; certificate; groundwater use (Griffin)
requires the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) to issue a
certificate of water rights to those with exempt wells (35 gallons per
minute or less) that register the well with ADWR. This appears to be another
loophole in AMA management. OPPOSE
- HB2545 annual vehicle emissions testing; exemption (Jones:
Gillette, Kolodin, et al) says that vehicles manufactured after 2018 are
exempt from emissions testing. There is no way to see if someone has modified the
new car to have more emissions and there is no expiration date so eventually
the new cars will be old cars. Basically, they are saying that no car on the
road requires emissions testing. OPPOSE
- HB2546 vehicle emissions; exemption (Jones:
Gillette, Kolodin, et al) Essentially from 2018 on no car will be subject
to emissions testing. OPPOSE
- HB2647 physical availability credits; water
supply (Smith: Griffin) allows a landowner who has an
irrigation grandfathered right in an active management area to retire the
land from irrigation but retain a physical availability credit to
non-irrigation use of the land. This specifically gets around assured
water supply requirements for subdivisions in AMAs and allows continued
groundwater mining without any replenishment. There must be replenishment
when the irrigation grandfathered right is converted to a new credit as
merely slowing the rate of groundwater depletion is not enough. OPPOSE
House
Commerce Committee at 2:00 PM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the
meeting here.
- HB2297
adaptive reuse; commercial buildings; zoning (Biasiucci: Bliss, Carbone,
et al) S/E:
same subject. This strike everything amendment allows the construction
of multi-family dwellings that doesn’t comply with local zoning requirements. OPPOSE
- HCM2001 reevaluate restrictions; chemical industry (Willoughby)
objects to new regulations on the chemical industry. It's unclear just
which regulations they are including in their objections, but one area the
Biden Administration has been taking action on is relative to per-
and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), otherwise known as "forever
chemicals" that cause harmful health impacts. OPPOSE
Wednesday,
February 7th
Senate Committee on Government at 9:00 AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting
here.
- SB1195 public monies; prohibited uses (Kern) is
a wacky bill. It says no public entity -- this would include any agencies,
universities, etc. -- can promote, advocate, or plan for or belong to an
organization that does anything relating to reducing meat and dairy
consumption, reducing or replacing vehicle travel with walking, biking, or
public transit, reusing water for human consumption that has touched human
feces (note that would eliminate the Colorado River), reducing
greenhouse gas emissions or tracking any information to determine
consumption based emissions, limiting the increase of the average
global temperature or producing a climate action plan, and a bunch
more ridiculous provisions. In addition to being really wacky, if passed,
it would tie the hands of agencies, cities, and universities relative to
doing anything about climate change or doing things to clean up our air by
reducing vehicle travel. OPPOSE
- SCR1015 public monies; prohibited expenditures (Kern)
refers to the ballot the provisions of the bill above, SB1195. OPPOSE
House
Committee on Government at 9:00 AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting
here.
- HB2457 government investments; plans; fiduciaries;
products (Montenegro) prohibits any investments by the
state that consider any environmental, social, or governance goals. This
is to prevent the state from divesting from fossil fuels or otherwise
being a responsible investor. OPPOSE
House
Municipal Oversight & Elections at 2:00 PM in HHR4
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting
here.
- HB2405 voter registrations; recorder; inactive status (Gillette:
Biasiucci, Bliss, et al) allows a county recorder to declare a
person's voter registration status as inactive, disenfranchising more
voters. OPPOSE
- HB2719 bond elections; date; voter turnout (Carbone:
Biasiucci, Dunn, et al) requires a number of things relative to bond
elections, including that there must at least be a 60 percent turnout for
the bond to be issued. Currently, less than 50% of registered voters
participate in Arizona elections, so this would make it impossible for cities
to pass any bonds It also says that elections can only be held on even
years and Tucson holds elections on odd and even years, so this seems to
be an attack on Tucson. OPPOSE
- HCR2028 elections; signature verification process (Kolodin:
McGarr, Rogers) refers to the ballot a signature verification process that
can result in disqualifying more voters. OPPOSE
- HCR2040 public monies; prohibited expenditures (Smith:
Biasiucci, Carbone, et al) is the same as SCR1015 (see above). OPPOSE
Thursday,
February 8th
Senate Natural Resources. Energy, Water Committee at 9:00
AM
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting
here.
- Presentations
- Overview
of CAP - Brenda Burman, General Manager of Central Arizona Project
- Arizona
Golf Water Stewardship - Rob Collins, Chairman of Arizona Alliance for
Golf Water Committee
- SB1221 basin management areas; appropriation (Kerr:
Griffin) establishes a process for creating basin management areas via a
petition with signatures from 15 percent of the registered voters that
live in the basin and receive their drinking water from the basin. These
can only be established if land subsidence is endangering property or
affecting water storage, and there is an accelerated decline in
groundwater levels. This would be too difficult to pass until is too late.
Why wait until the situation is critical? . OPPOSE
- SB1242 ADWR; application; review; time frames (Shope:
Kerr) Cuts the time frame for ADWR to review applications for assured
water supply certificates nearly in half. This doesn’t allow enough time
for ADWR to do a thorough review. OPPOSE
- SB1289 DWR; hydrology reports (Hoffman)
requires the Governor and the Department of Water Resources to provide a
report on the hydrology of an active management area to the House and
Senate Natural Resource, Energy, and Water committees 30 days before it is
issued. There is no reason that the legislature should be reviewing the
hydrology report before it is published. Are they hydrologists? OPPOSE
I supported the Sierra Club's position that we oppose SB1221. It establishes a rural groundwater management setup that's favored by many farming interest groups but opposed by many environmentalists and some rural community leaders because of the many-step process for creating such areas. First, 15% of registered voters within a basin would have to petition to create one. Then, the affected county's board of supervisors would have to recommend it and then, voters within the proposed basin would have to approve its creation.
ReplyDeleteHere's an update on the bill by Tony Davis, Arizona Daily Star
Rural water regulation bill advances
https://arizonadailystar-az.newsmemory.com/?publink=1c6615cd3_134d175