Showing posts with label San Pedro River. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Pedro River. Show all posts

Friday, September 19, 2025

  Take Action: Protect the San Pedro River and Our Climate

Your voice is needed to defend the Sky Islands on two fronts — one local, the other national.

 

1) The San Pedro River, a life force in our region, is at risk from an aluminum melting plant proposed for Benson, Arizona. The 200-acre facility would be located right next to the river and has raised concerns about water usage, air pollutants, and toxic run-off, especially worrisome given the company’s track record of violations. Get more details and sign a coalition petition opposing this project.  

https://www.change.org/p/save-our-health-our-river-from-industrial-harm-in-benson-az

 

2) The Trump administration recently proposed to repeal the EPA’s 2009 Endangerment Finding, in which the agency formally acknowledged decades of science showing how greenhouse gases harm the climate and our health. The finding set the stage for crucial regulatory actions, as well as emission limits on factories, power plants, vehicles, and agriculture. If the finding is revoked, it’ll eliminate the legal basis for the EPA to rein in pollution under the Clean Air Act, harming people and our climate and pushing species closer to the brink. Learn more and take action with our allies at the Center for Biological Diversity (comments due Sept. 22).

https://act.biologicaldiversity.org/cMe-8_08KUGelloWGdcskw2

- Action by Sky Island Alliance 

Monday, October 2, 2023

SURVEY: Share your thoughts about legal personhood for rivers.

Study Title: Personhood for Rivers in Arizona
Principal Investigator: Madeleine Oliver


Summary of the research
This research is inspired by a growing international popularity for granting legal personhood to rivers or areas of the environment. What this means is that the river or environmental area is provided with a legal status and rights that can be upheld in a court of law.

The purpose of this research is to gather perspectives on the concepts of establishing legal rights and legal personhood for rivers in particular, especially in Arizona, as a part of a graduate research project. The goal of this research is to gain some understanding of how a community might react to a hypothetical granting of legal rights to rivers.

If you agree to voluntarily participate you will be provided with information and asked about your perspective on the concept of granting legal rights and personhood to rivers or other environmental areas. You will also be asked for reactions to different hypothetical situations, and for some contextual information about yourself. The survey contains 21 questions and is expected to take no more than 15 minutes of your time. No personal identifying information will be collected or used in any publication or sharing of the final research product.

Fill out survey here:

Thursday, June 24, 2021

COMMENTS NEEDED TODAY to protect the San Pedro River!

photo by G. Anderson, WWP 


Comments Needed 

The San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area was set aside by Presidential Proclamation in 1988 to conserve, protect, and enhance the unique and fragile San Pedro River and the public lands along its banks. This was the first Riparian National Conservation Area ever designated, and it is truly a special and ecologically important place. Because of this designation, the Bureau of Land Management has a heightened duty to “protect the riparian areas and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the public lands surrounding the San Pedro River in Cochise County.”

Unfortunately, the Bureau has failed to meet their burden in protecting this riparian desert treasure, and for decades has allowed livestock grazing to continue to damage wildlife habitats, the uplands, the riparian areas, and the river itself. Right now, the Bureau is proposing to issue 10-year grazing leases to a small group of ranchers who will be able to graze their cows at rock bottom prices (just $1.35 per cow-calf pair per month), while at the same time turning their backs on mountains of evidence clearly indicating that livestock do not belong on these conservation lands.

We need your help, to let the Bureau know that we expect them to faithfully do their job.

Urge the BLM to conserve, protect, and enhance the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area by eliminating livestock grazing from the entirety of the area.

You can send your comments to the BLM via email: blm_az_tfo_sprnca_rmp@blm.gov.

We’ve read through nearly 400 pages of documents and developed these talking points to get you started on your own letter to the agency:

  • The BLM must recognize that a proposal to authorize four 10-year leases in a Riparian National Conservation Area requires the full review and analysis of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), rather than the abbreviated analysis and timeframe for public comment allowed in an Environmental Analysis (EA).

  • The agency must analyze at least one alternative that eliminates livestock grazing from all portions of all allotments that fall within the boundaries of the San Pedro RNCA.

  • The public deserves to know how much the fencing, stock tanks, troughs, and other livestock infrastructure will cost, and how much money the ranchers will be required to pay for the privilege of grazing these publicly owned lands.

  • The agency must analyze the impacts on recreational users of their plan to put cows, fences, gates, and huge gap fences across the Babocomari River, as well impacts of livestock on educational and cultural resources.

  • The agency must develop a plan to address the ongoing and longstanding problem of cows trespassing into the San Pedro RNCA and must disclose how these new 10-year leases will exacerbate that problem.

  • Ask the agency to protect the Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Babocomari and San Pedro Rivers and not to compromise the ability of these rivers to be designated as Wild and Scenic Rivers.

  • The agency must be held accountable for failing to protect public health by allowing livestock to contaminate the San Pedro and Babocomari Rivers with E. coli, violating Arizona’s clean water standards.

  • Finally, the agency needs to explain how allowing livestock in a national riparian conservation area during a period of extraordinary drought, and in light of climate change impacts to rivers and wildlife, meets the agency’s duty to conserve, protect, and enhance these lands.

The BLM will release an environmental analysis (EA) document for the next step in this process. Given that the Land Health Evaluations and scoping packet were almost 400 pages, we expect the EA will be huge, but no matter how much paperwork the BLM does, it is likely to again miss the mark on actually ensuring grazing conserves, protects, and enhances the special resources of the San Pedro Riparian NCA

If you have visited the San Pedro RNCA, you can send photos, stories, drawings, songs or poems about your visit in your comments and let BLM know how important these public lands are to you.

Thank you for taking the time to speak out for this precious place! For more information, contact Cyndi Tuell, cyndi@westernwatersheds.org


- WWP


More information: 

BLM considers renewing cattle grazing along San Pedro River with new conditions

https://tucson.com/news/local/blm-considers-renewing-cattle-grazing-along-san-pedro-river-with-new-conditions/article_c9252d72-d37e-11eb-9edb-f765d9cc65cd.html?fbclid=IwAR3-GqiS89LyFX2YtXiIoAWl16XQ26DNYqzxYblOqLjbJ-7b_kKRH0UwA8M

Saturday, August 10, 2019

Tell your members of Congress: No wall on the San Pedro River


Act now! Construction is imminent. It’s not too late to stop this wall. Contact your congressional members NOW. Time is of the essence.

“The San Pedro harbors the richest, most dense and diverse inland bird population in the United States as well—385 species... For millions of migratory birds traveling from winter food in Central America to their northern breeding grounds, there is just one reliable passage. Just this one.” (excerpt from Barbara Kingsolver’s “Patience of a Saint”)

Scott Feldhausen, BLM Gila District Manager, in a July 3, 2019 letter to Paul Enriquez, Customs and Border Protection, Washington, D.C. writes, “This extreme flow regime, coupled with the seasonal variability of summer monsoons, make installation of permanent, yet permeable barriers, an engineering challenge… Currently, seasonable removal of the “normandy-styled” vehicular barriers has allowed the San Pedro River to maintain natural processes…” “Floods come down like rolling loads of cement.” (The Secret Knowledge of Water by C. Childs)

Potentially Catastrophic Border Wall Impacts:

 • Bulldozers, graders, back-hoes, chainsaws and the like are expected to begin as early as this month (August, 2019).
• Bulldozing native vegetation for 150ft “enforcement zone” on both sides of the wall will scar the land destroying habitat and visual aesthetics. Construction of 30ft concrete-filled, impermeable steel pedestrian barrier with 24 hour lighting, 31/2 football fields long with imbedded cameras.All this within this irreplaceable riparian ecosystem.
• High velocity flood flows – 8400 cfs (cubic feet/sec) = 62,836 gallons of water/sec with accumulation of tree debris and sediment creating a “dam” that can rise above the barrier, causing damage and potentially harming infrastructure downstream.
 • River bank destabilization coupled with increased erosion causing loss of vegetation, impacting the health and stability of the riparian area • Disruption of primary migratory wildlife corridor; threatened and endangered animals need these areas for movement across the border; jaguar, ocelot, jaguarundi, Mexican Gray Wolf, Mexican Spotted Owl, Mexican Long-nosed Bat and others. The wall will impede or inhibit the survival of these threatened animals.
• In 1995 the American Bird Conservancy recognized the San Pedro as its first Globally Important Bird Area. The Area features 300 migratory birds, 100 species of breeding birds, 200 species of butterflies, 87 species of mammals, 65 species of reptiles and amphibians, and native fish.
• “The river corridor supports 2/3 of the avian diversity of the entire United States...” (R. J. Luce, River of Life, San Pedro Anthology, 2019)
• In excess of 23,000 people visited the San Pedro House and Fairbanks Schoolhouse (a historical location within the riparian area) in FY2018 contributing over $300,000 to the local economy. We cannot afford to impact a critical migratory flyway and river corridor, compromising its pristine beauty and discouraging potential revenue from thousands of visitors each year.

The San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area (SPRNCA)

The San Pedro River is the last free flowing desert river in the southwest. SPRNCA was the first conservation area of its kind in our country designated by Congress on Nov 18, 1988 by Public Law 100-696:“In order to protect the riparian areas and the aquatic, wildlife, archaeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the public lands surrounding the San Pedro River in Cochise County, Arizona...” - Legal Hurdles

No environmental, archaeological or historic preservation laws apply (federal, state or local). In 2005, Congress passed the REAL ID Act granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to waive any and all laws with regard to constructing walls and roads along the border. Several public interest groups are in federal court in the District of Columbia right now asking for a preliminary injunction that would halt construction activity in the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area.

MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND KEY SENATORS TO CONTACT:

1. Senator Krysten Sinema, Office: 3333 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ 85016, email: https://www.sinema.senate.gov/contact-krysten, phone: 602.598.7327 She is on the Senate Homeland Security Committee 

2. Senator Martha McSally, Office: 407 W. Congress St., Suite 103, Tucson, AZ 85701email:https://www.mcsally.senate.gov/contact_martha, phone:520.670.6334

3. U.S. Congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick, Sierra Vista Office: 77 Calle Portal, Suite B160, Sierra Vista, AZ 85635, phone: 520.459.3115, Tucson Office: 1636 North Swan Rd. Suite 200, Tucson, AZ 85712, phone: 520.881.3588, email:https://kirkpatrick.house.gov/contact/emsil-me

4. U.S. Congressman Raul Grijalva, Office: El Pueblo Community Center, 101 W. Irvington Rd. Buildings 4 and 5 Tucson, AZ 85714, email: https://grijalva.house.gov/email-raul, phone: 520.622.6788 Chair, House Natural Resources Committee – jurisdiction over all public lands.

Conserve, Protect and Enhance • Page 2 • created by www.mawcenter.org, 8/2019

MORE INFORMATION

Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Public Comments: Tell CBP NO Border Wall on San Pedro River


Center for Biological Diversity's Laiken Jordahl, went to the San Pedro River, which is the last undammed, free-flowing river in the Southwest. The Border Patrol has announced plans to build across this pristine river, choking off vital waterways and access to habitat for wildlife. The Trump administration has dismantled 41 environmental and health laws to push this through - including the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act. This would be a disaster for Arizona!  Ecotourism is a big part of our $22 billion dollar tourist industry!

https://www.facebook.com/CenterforBioDiv/videos/2422951604602736/

Comments and information will be accepted until Friday, July 5, 2019


Please, write a letter expressing your opposition to wall being built with your tax dollars on the San Pedro River. The river, the beauty and solace, and the habituate it provides must not be destroyed. Speak from your heart and head. And share this message with your friends.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, CBP, is seeking public input concerning a proposed border barrier project to construct new bollard wall in place of dilapidated and outdated designs in Pima and Cochise Counties.

CBP proposes to replace up to approximately 63 miles of pedestrian fencing and vehicle barrier with new bollard wall. The project also includes road construction and improvement and lighting installation. The proposed design of the new bollard wall includes 18-to-30 foot, concrete-filled steel bollards that are approximately 6” x 6” in diameter.

CBP is seeking input regarding the proposed project’s potential impacts to the environment, culture, and commerce, including potential socioeconomic impacts, and quality of life. Comments on the project will be considered as a part of CBP’s project planning process.

Comments and information will be accepted by email at:

commentsenv@cbp.dhs.gov

or mailed to:

U.S. Border Patrol Headquarters
1300 Pennsylvania Ave. 6.5E Mail Stop 1039
Washington, DC 20229-1100

Comments should reference “Pima and Cochise Counties Border Infrastructure Projects” in the subject of the email.

If you would prefer, you can also sign a petition from Defend Wildlife.

(Consider personalizing it for more impact.)