Sandy Bahr mentioned in the Sierra Club Legislative update that last week was the last week to hear bills in the standing committees. It was not. Legislators extended the deadline for hearing bills in committee until March 31st, What does that mean? Very full agendas for this next week and a bunch of strike-everything amendments where they replace the underlying bill with a brand-new bill but keep the number. This is super confusing for the public and is frequently used for controversial bills.
One of the strike-everything amendments up next week is on
SB1278 and it will be heard in the Health and Human Services Committee on Monday, March 27th at 2:00 pm. The
strike-everything amendment would take away local control on home appliances and limit local leaders’ ability to establish local building code provisions related to affordability, energy, and public health. This strike-everything amendment could also have long-lasting effects on health and safety regulations in International Codes related to hazardous chemicals, fire, plumbing, and water. If this striker is passed, it will also thwart local government decision-making related to appliances, zoning, building energy codes, and possibly affordable housing policies.
Monday, March 27th
House Committee on
Health and Human Services at 2:00 PM
Tuesday, March 28th
House Committee on
Commerce at 2:00 PM
- SB1161 probation; work time credits;
reporting (Kaiser: Shamp) has a strike-everything amendment S/E: affordable housing; development standards;
report that seems like a step in the right
direction – except that the language in the bill makes sure that it
applies to municipalities with population greater than a very specific
525,000 people (Tucson is just above that at 549,000), doesn’t allow
for development less than 80 feet in height, doesn’t allow for less
than the maximum density specified by current zoning, and doesn’t
allow for general plan amendments or permit review. While urban
infill is a desirable goal, this looks like a giveaway to developers
specifically aimed at Tucson and Phoenix. OPPOSE
House Committee on Natural Resources,
Energy, and Water at 2:00 PM
- SB1104 procurement; information
disclosure; bidders (Carroll: Gowan) has a strike-everything
amendment on S/E: corporation commission; electric
generational resources that seeks to pre-empt
the renewable energy standard or any subsequent clean energy
standard at the Arizona Corporation Commission by codifying a weak
standard. We are opposed to this because the ACC is proper venue for
establishing a clean energy standard as what is required or allowed
has a significant impact on rates and ratemaking is within the
exclusive purview of the ACC. We are also opposed to codifying a low
weak standard. OPPOSE
- SB1247 technical correction; waste; enforcement;
venue(now: recycling fund; appropriation (Shope)
appropriates $2.5 million from the Recycling Fund to the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality to provide grants for recycling
research, demonstration projects, new technologies, market
development and source reduction studies. SUPPORT
- SB1432 assured water; small residential
developments (Wadsack: Jones) requires those seeking
a building permit for six or more residences within an active
management area in an unincorporated area of a county to demonstrate
an assured water supply. This closes one loophole in these
requirements. SUPPORT
- SB1660 water; effluent; credits(now: water;
storage; effluent; credits) (Kerr: Kaiser, Dunn)
allows certain industrial facilities to construct and operate an
on-site wastewater treatment facility for wastewater, and store the
water underground. They must get an aquifer protection permit and
treat the water to drinking water standards and they must leave 25
percent of the water they store in the aquifer. SUPPORT
Wednesday, March 29th
House Committee on Government at 10:00 AM
- SB1611 public entities; contracts;
prohibition (Kern) prohibits a public entity from
requiring a company to implement an environmental, social or
governance policy as a condition of a contract. OPPOSE
- SB1694 public monies; ideology training;
prohibition (Hoffman: Borrelli, Kern, et al.)
prohibits any public entity from requiring and spending public
monies on a diversity, equity and inclusion program and allows an
employee who is required to participate in the program to bring
action against the public entity. OPPOSE
- SCR1023 charter cities; repeal (Wadsack:
Jones) refers to the ballot a measure to repeal provisions in the
constitution that allow for charter cities, which would really
affect local planning for climate and other environmental
protections. OPPOSE
House Committee on Appropriations at 2:00
PM
- SB1392 appropriation; state park; Verde River (Kerr)
appropriates an undesignated amount for a state park at the
headwaters of the Verde River. It is good to see legislators
supporting parks again and this area of the Verde River is beautiful
and worthy of protection as a state park. Establishing a park there
could help indirectly limit groundwater pumping there too, which is
a serious threat to the river. SUPPORT
Thursday, March 30th
Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Energy, and Water at 9:00 AM
- HB2618 decommissioning; solar and wind; standards (Griffin)
proscribes requirements for solar and wind facilities, including
decommissioning. It is odd that she is calling out only these and
not including anything on coal or gas. OPPOSE
- HB2669 solid waste; sludge; water quality (Now:
prohibition; biosolids; land application) (Dunn, Griffin) includes
limits on the application of biosolids. SUPPORT
- HB2806 state parks heritage fund; appropriation (Carbone:
Biasiucci, Blattman, et al.) makes a onetime appropriation of $10
million to the State Parks Heritage Fund. While we support this, we
want to see SB1224 adopted as it includes ongoing funding for the
Heritage Fund from the lottery. SUPPORT
- HCM2008 air quality; ozone standards; opposing (Carbone)
asks Congress and the Biden administration to stop the Environmental
Protection Agency from imposing any sanctions on Arizona for not
meeting clean air requirements. OPPOSE
| |
No comments:
Post a Comment